Skip to content
Service

Dedicated Team

Senior engineers embedded with your team, at your cadence — with the person who writes the code being the person you talk to.

What it covers

The work itself

Embedded engineers

Engineers who join your standups, your board and your repository, and who work to your process rather than reporting into a parallel one.

Overlapping hours

We commit to a defined overlap window with your working day and publish it. For European clients that is most of the day; for US Eastern it is a solid morning block; for US Pacific it is a genuine constraint we will discuss honestly rather than paper over.

Direct communication

Your Slack, your issue tracker, your review process. No account manager relaying messages, and no ticket queue between you and the person writing the code.

Architecture and code review

Senior input on design decisions, and review capacity for your existing team — often the highest-value part for teams whose seniors are stretched.

Specific capability gaps

Where the need is a skill rather than headcount — .NET performance work, an AI pipeline, a data migration, a security review.

Documented handover

Everything we build is documented as we go, so an engagement can end without a knowledge cliff.

Who it's for

And who it is not for

Engineering teams that need senior capacity quickly, or a specific capability they do not have in house, and who want engineers rather than an outsourcing relationship mediated by account management.

Right fit if

  • You have more roadmap than engineers and hiring will take six months
  • You need a skill for a defined period rather than permanently
  • Your seniors are spending their time on review rather than on building
  • A previous outsourcing engagement gave you juniors after selling you seniors
  • You need coverage in a timezone you do not have

Not the right fit if

  • Teams looking primarily for the lowest hourly rate — we are not the cheapest and do not try to be
  • Engagements where the engineer is expected to work without access to your codebase or team
  • Fully autonomous delivery with no technical counterpart on your side

We would rather lose the project than take one we are the wrong firm for.

What you get

Deliverables, in writing

This list goes into the proposal. If something is not on it, it is not in scope — and we would rather argue about that now than in month three.

  • Named engineers, with real CVs and a call before you commit
  • A written overlap and availability commitment
  • Work delivered inside your process, repository and definition of done
  • Weekly written summary of what shipped and what is blocked
  • Documentation produced alongside the code
  • A notice period and handover plan agreed at the start, not at the end

Timeline & engagement

What it costs you in time

Typical timelines

Single engineer

From 1 month

Typically starting within two weeks, subject to availability.

Small pod (2–3 engineers)

From 3 months

Enough to own a workstream end to end rather than assisting with one.

Capability engagement

2–6 weeks

A specific skill for a specific task — performance, AI pipeline, migration, security review.

Engagement models

Monthly per engineer

A fixed monthly rate per named engineer at an agreed allocation. No hourly timesheets, because billing by the hour rewards the wrong thing.

Best for: Ongoing capacity needs.

Part-time allocation

A defined number of days per week from a senior engineer.

Best for: Architecture input and review capacity rather than build throughput.

Fixed-scope capability project

A bounded piece of specialist work at a fixed price.

Best for: A specific gap with a clear finish line.

FAQ

Dedicated Team — questions we get asked

  • Who exactly will we be working with?

    Named people, whose backgrounds you see and who you speak to before you commit. We do not sell senior engineers and staff the work with juniors — it is the single most common complaint about outsourced teams and the easiest thing to simply not do. If we do not have the right person available, we say so rather than substituting.

  • How honest are you about being a small team?

    Completely. We are a small senior team, and that is the offer — you get people with real experience and direct access to them. If your project needs thirty engineers, we are the wrong firm and we will tell you in the first call rather than the third.

  • What about the timezone difference?

    We are in Pakistan Standard Time, UTC+5. That gives near-full overlap with Europe, the Gulf and the UK; a solid morning overlap with US Eastern; and a genuinely constrained one with US Pacific. We publish the overlap window we will actually keep rather than promising availability we cannot sustain.

  • What happens to the code if we stop working with you?

    Nothing changes. Work happens in your repository, in your infrastructure, under your process, documented as it goes. There is no dependency on us to keep it running, and the handover plan is agreed at the start rather than negotiated at the end.

  • Can you work with our existing team rather than around them?

    That is the intended mode. The most successful engagements have our engineers taking a workstream inside your process, participating in review in both directions, and being treated as team members rather than as a vendor. Engagements where the outside team is isolated tend to produce work that does not fit.

Tell us what your operation actually does.

A 30-minute call, no slide deck. We will tell you whether this is worth building, whether an off-the-shelf product would serve you better, and roughly what it would take.

30 minutes · We reply within one business day.

WhatsApp Book a call